The post Corporate Responsibility vs Accountability appeared first on Climate Impact Capital.
]]>Corporate accountability: When corporations improve their own footprint and that of their consumers, providing better choices without passing on regressive costs
We share the world – the good, the bad, and the ugly, but can we share the blame? Global warming is here, but is any single entity responsible for rising emissions that lead to shifting ecology, extreme weather, and other larger, yet unclear, impacts? It’s easy to point the finger on greedy corporations, peddling their evil goods on the unsuspecting public, but the public isn’t blameless, driving to the protest in their gas-engine cars, idling in line at Starbucks, and returning home to their large, air-conditioned homes.
While there is enough blame to go around, society already picked the villain. It’s up to common enemy #1, Oil & Gas, to seek redemption. Numerous call-to-actions including protests and shareholder mandates, have led to small steps, such as efficiency targets, 30-year emissions reduction goals, and HSE-performance dependent bonuses.
This, of course, is not enough. The industry realizes it, and the money realizes it, too. Blackrock and JPMorgan Chase are dictating the need for meaningful progress towards climate goals, and industry goliaths are coming around. BP, BHP, and Repsol are just a few corporations that have “net-zero” announcements. But what does this really mean? Surely, they are not shutting down.
Net-zero operations in the core business can be achieved, albeit at a cost. For upstream producers, the low-hanging fruit is wide deployment of lead detection and repair (LDAR) and renewable electrification. Reaching net-zero also means stopping all but emergency flaring through investment in gas infrastructure and only working with midstream partners with adequate and redundant gas processing facilities. In some cases, these improvements help the bottom line through energy efficiency and operational savings. In others, especially once emission penalties are in place, poorly operated companies will fail. This is what we call table stakes, and we expect that all O&G upstream and midstream companies will achieve this before 2030 or risk losing their license to operate.
But, let’s not forget O&G’s little brother – downstream refineries, petrochemical facilities, and transport – responsible for end-use products like gasoline, diesel and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Low cost and (ideally) profitable carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) – a holy-grail for the energy industry – would allow these emissions to be captured, sequestered underground for millennia, or up-cycled to new products. Even power plants could use CCUS to balance renewable intermittency while committing to carbon -free power. The path to net-zero is a lot less straightforward for this sector, but the science is compelling, and a new industry is burgeoning.
Operational improvements will define responsible corporations, and responsibility is quickly becoming the barrier to entry. True accountability, though, can only be achieved through net-zero products, providing consumers with a reasonable choice for reduced impact at the use-phase. Regardless of how they are made, consumers are demanding cleaner products, and corporations are on the hook to deliver. First mover’s advantage is at play – who will win the accountability game? Repsol already drew a line, announcing net-zero operations AND end-use by 2050. BP followed suit, and the markets, the money, and the public are watching the rest of the industry.
Is there such thing as carbon-negative oil and gas? Maybe. Can O&G create a business around it? Probably. Will shareholders pay for it? Probably not.
So, while corporations continue to peddle their evil goods to the people lounging in their AC homes, consumers must begin take ownership of their choices. As they become more willing to make lifestyle changes, corporations can meet those needs with better choices and reduced impact. After all, climate change doesn’t discriminate; corporations, individuals, municipalities – we are all adversely impacted, and we are all accountable. So maybe next time, we walk to the protest?
The post Corporate Responsibility vs Accountability appeared first on Climate Impact Capital.
]]>The post 2020 Impact Investing Insights appeared first on Climate Impact Capital.
]]>Combating and adapting to climate change is a lofty goal and though the global track record on positive impact is all over the map (literally), we see collaboration as the key to meaningful progress. Recognizing that proactive organizations will survive and thrive, many of you are already on your journey and some of you will embark in this new decade. In either case, we hope to join you and to collaborate with you in 2020! Below, we highlight some of the major climate & energy trends of the last 10 years and share our outlook for the new decade. We hope you will engage with us as we work together to create the bridge to the low-carbon future.
2010s: The Decade of Disjointed Acceptance
In the 2010s, most of us agreed on climate change science and accepted that action is necessary. Globally, we witnessed emerging nationalistic sentiments, putting self-interest above the greater good. Climate consensus led to only fragmented actions toward (somewhat) mutual climate goals. In the midst of geopolitical turmoil, protesting (climate) inaction, greenwashing empty action, and public rioting against expensive action confused us, scared us, but most of all, pushed us to expect more. What happened in the 2010s:
2020s: The Decade of the Climate Emergency
In a true prediction of the next decade, Oxford Dictionary declared ‘climate emergency’ the word of 2019. We expect that there will finally be a worldwide declaration of a “climate emergency,” and public and private organizations will commit to climate action plans, incentives/regulations, and other substantive change. With the passing of some major scientific milestones (we say goodbye to 1.5*C and recognize that 2*C is a bullish goal), adaptation will become an equal focus with mitigation. What we expect in the 2020s:
The post 2020 Impact Investing Insights appeared first on Climate Impact Capital.
]]>