Warning: Undefined array key "show_in_rest" in /srv/users/serverpilot/apps/cic/public/wp-content/plugins/simple-taxonomy-refreshed/includes/class-simpletaxonomyrefreshed-client.php on line 636
Warning: Undefined array key "show_in_rest" in /srv/users/serverpilot/apps/cic/public/wp-content/plugins/simple-taxonomy-refreshed/includes/class-simpletaxonomyrefreshed-client.php on line 636
Warning: Undefined array key "show_in_rest" in /srv/users/serverpilot/apps/cic/public/wp-content/plugins/simple-taxonomy-refreshed/includes/class-simpletaxonomyrefreshed-client.php on line 636
Warning: Undefined array key "show_in_rest" in /srv/users/serverpilot/apps/cic/public/wp-content/plugins/simple-taxonomy-refreshed/includes/class-simpletaxonomyrefreshed-client.php on line 636 ERCOT narrowly avoided 'much more devastating' impacts as nearly half of generation went offline: CEO - Climate Impact CapitalERCOT narrowly avoided 'much more devastating' impacts as nearly half of generation went offline: CEO - Climate Impact Capital
ERCOT narrowly avoided ‘much more devastating’ impacts as nearly half of generation went offline: CEO
At the highest point, about 48.6% of the grid operator’s power generation — 52,277 MW out of 107,514 MW in installed capacity — was forced offline due to the extreme weather conditions.
